Sunday, September 16, 2012

5399 Week3 Recommendations and Reflections


EDLD 5399 Capstone Superintendent Internship

 

Week Three Assignment, Part 1 – CARE Model Analysis of District/Campus Improvement Initiatives or Action Research Plans

 

Please review your intern plan. In the first course, students were encouraged to engage in some action research, or participate in district or campus improvement initiatives. Each of you has had some experiences with such initiatives or action plans. Please review those experiences and complete the following analysis:

 

Concerns – Review your participation in improvement initiatives or efforts to engage in action research, and list at least three concerns that you have identified from these experiences – a concern may be any matter that engages your attention or interest.

 

1.  Omission of training principals to handle public relations has backfired.

2.  Deliberate training for schools to build partnerships with businesses for support needs strengthened.

3.  The AP program has not been successful for students.

 

Affirmations - Review your participation in improvement initiatives or efforts to engage in action research, and affirm or identify at least 3 actions that must be sustained and supported to achieve the District/Campus improvement initiatives.

 

1.  In the last year, there have been incidents where principals have been interviewed by the media under stressful circumstances when things were said that embarrassed the district and damage control had to be put into place. This could be avoided to improve public relations.

2.  Partnerships with businesses have been dependent on individuals with knowledge, strength and desire to work with outside stakeholders rather than putting a definite plan into place. The effect has been that some schools have excellent programs while others are lacking.

3.  There have been concerns for years about the successful outcomes of the AP programs. Grade point incentives were put into place, but failed to motivate students to do well on the tests. There has been a lot of talk about what to do, but principals have resisted any changes in policy.

 

Recommendations - Review your participation in improvement initiatives or efforts to engage in action research and describe at least 3 recommendations you would make regarding the District/Campus Improvement plans or action research plans.

 

1.  A training initiative for principals to understand public relations when speaking to the media should be instituted. A number of years ago, short videos showing possible scenarios were produced by the Communications Department. These were shown and appropriate responses were discussed. While the official line is for principals to refer any and all media to the central office, this is not always practical and there are times when a principal may be caught off guard when he or she has granted an interview. An hour-long training would benefit administrators who are unfamiliar with the media’s perspective as well as give direction in emergency situations where media may show up and some kind of comment needs to be made.

2.  Although an outstanding Partners in Education program exists, establishing relationships between schools and businesses is left to individuals that principals have appointed in this position. Many do not have the time or may lack knowledge of how to strengthen partnerships or even what to ask for from businesses. Step one would to indentify successful school liaisons and have them present to others at monthly meeting to offer suggestions and tips for successful partnerships. Step two would be to pair successful liaisons with those who would like to improve their programs to mentor better relationships. Working with schools in the same feeder patterns would be logical since they could work as a unit with businesses in their areas. This would simplify the structure for schools to work with businesses as teams. 

3.  The last superintendent threatened to reassign teachers who had been in charge of AP classes for years, often as a reward for seniority, who had not had success. Principals rejected this; however, looking at this objectively, after giving a teacher several years to increase passage rates, if they are still falling short of objectives for the program, they should be replaced. I understand this sounds cold; however, it doesn’t make sense to continue with the same people in charge year after year when, for example, only 1 student in 40 passed the AP exam. Teachers already attend AP training. An effort needs to be made to find schools that have better results than this district and find out what they are doing differently, and then those initiatives need to be put into place. If the teachers who have been teaching those classes do not have better outcomes, then it is time to let someone else have the opportunity to try.

 

Evaluate - Review your participation in improvement initiatives or efforts to engage in action research and identify at least 3 strategies for evaluating the improvement plans or recommendations.

 

1.  After training in media relations, principals will be surveyed to measure the effectiveness of the training. Monitoring comments made by administrators throughout the year and how many times the district must intervene to correct information or do damage control will measure the success of the program.

2.  Positive outcomes of better Partner in Education relationships can be measured by an increase in partners as well as an increase in volunteerism, contact time, internships, in-kind, and monetary donations that is calculated at the end of the school year.

3.  Success will be measured by student outcomes on the AP exam by how many student pass and the level they are rated for the exam to count as college credit.

 

EDLD 5399 Capstone Superintendent Internship

 

Week Three Assignment, Part 2 – Part C of the Comprehensive Final Report

Describing Recommendations and District/Campus Improvement Initiative/Action Research Lessons Learned

 

Review the above analysis, and write at least one page thoroughly describing recommendations and lessons learned from experiences with the improvement initiatives or action research plans.

 

 When I was doing my internship for my principalship program 10 years ago, one of my cohorts most valuable and pleasant meetings was with the then communications director and the person in charge of doing video programs. They discussed the mindset of reporters and what they were looking for in reporting the news. Certainly situations, especially with schools, are easily sensationalized, but there are techniques administrators can use to make sure they don’t panic and create a problem that wasn’t there to begin with. After going over some do’s and don’t’s with a checklist, they played videoed scenarios showing a situation. They would stop the tape to discuss with the group what appropriate responses would be, then play an absolutely wrong response, discuss it, then play a good response. By preparing administrators for possible situations and making them aware of the agenda of reporters, for the good or bad,  educators were made more comfortable with the process and knew where to turn for direction and help. I was taken aback when I was told by the current Communications Director that training was not necessary anymore because principals were to direct the media to the central office for any situation. Unfortunately, that is not always what happens. On one instance, a student who brought a service dog to school after clearing with the central office, was sent to the principal’s office and sent home for bringing an animal to school. The mother complained to the media and the media went to the school to interview the principal about a wildly inappropriate remard she said to the mother. Principals can make the decision to speak to the media without central office approval, but this tense situation really blew out of proportion when the principal reinterated she had said to the mother, “We don’t let students bring guns to school just because that makes them feel safer,” when explaining why the student couldn’t bring a service animal to school. Not only did the principal violate the law concerning service animals because of a misunderstanding and a communication breakdown, but the district had to step in the correct the misunderstanding as well as the gaff concerning bringing guns to school. With effective media training in place, this situation could have been avoided.

 

The Partner in Education program is one of the best in the state; however, it is based more on individual relationships rather than relationships between the schools and the businesses. This is not necessarily a bad thing; however, when a liaison or a business contact changes, many times the entire relationship fizzles. In an effort to counteract that, a stronger bond needs to be forged so that liaisons understand what is important to businesses and how schools and businesses can work together for mutually success outcomes. A structured mentorship program together with feeder pattern schools working together might forge better relationship with less effort since many things would not be duplicated. It would also give businesses a stable framework to build the relationship with schools.

 

AP exam results have been incredibly poor for years. The most successful area has been been with Spanish Language with a 15% passage rate. It seems strange this rate should be celebrated as successful, but when looking at passage rates like 1 in 40 at the lowest level of achievement in English, one can tell this district is in trouble. No student has ever passed the Economics exam. It is time to get tough with trying other methods and other personnel in these positions since it is clear the same thing happens every year and no progress has been made. Better training needs to be put in place and teachers need to be replaced as well if they cannot show reasonable progress in helping students pass the exam with scores that can be applied to college credit.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment